<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC caption writers slip up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/</link>
	<description>Good web writing? Get to the point. Be clear. Have a conversation. Make people smile.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Yikes! a bit harsh. 

We have a very small population, and are an 'advanced' nation (hence use alot of electrickery), so per capita, probably, yeah. There aren't many of us here.

We also have a very pro-environment govt now who signed up to Kyoto straight away etc etc. The Howard govt was more into business than environment. This govt is more balanced. China and India are pretty bad atm for the environment... and will get alot worse... they have a hell of alot more people there to pollute with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes! a bit harsh. </p>
<p>We have a very small population, and are an &#8216;advanced&#8217; nation (hence use alot of electrickery), so per capita, probably, yeah. There aren&#8217;t many of us here.</p>
<p>We also have a very pro-environment govt now who signed up to Kyoto straight away etc etc. The Howard govt was more into business than environment. This govt is more balanced. China and India are pretty bad atm for the environment&#8230; and will get alot worse&#8230; they have a hell of alot more people there to pollute with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmcga</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmcga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Lovely. Though if &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7092989.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; is anything to go by, they might have to change it back again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely. Though if <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7092989.stm"  rel="nofollow">this article</a> is anything to go by, they might have to change it back again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joff</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Joff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2007/11/11/bbc-caption-writers-slip-up/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>You'll be delighted to hear they've corrected their caption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be delighted to hear they&#8217;ve corrected their caption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
