<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freelancers: is it &#8220;me&#8221; or is it &#8220;we&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/10/08/freelancers-is-it-me-or-is-it-we/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/10/08/freelancers-is-it-me-or-is-it-we/</link>
	<description>Good web writing? Get to the point. Be clear. Have a conversation. Make people smile.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/10/08/freelancers-is-it-me-or-is-it-we/comment-page-1/#comment-8713</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=744#comment-8713</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried to get the best of both, operating under a company name but never hiding the fact that it&#039;s primarily one person. I haven&#039;t found a downside yet, and it leaves open the option to expand.

Actually, expansion is something I&#039;ve been thinking about a lot lately. And I&#039;m finding it hard to see many good reasons for doing so - in the conventional sense, at least. The internet is allowing us to operate as loose confederations of solo operators, coming together and moving apart as the work demands. It&#039;s a fun and flexible way to work. Why go through the hassle and extra cost of formally employing someone?

So yes, I do say &#039;we&#039;, more than I expected. But generally speaking, that &#039;we&#039; is a reference to my contacts list rather than myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried to get the best of both, operating under a company name but never hiding the fact that it&#8217;s primarily one person. I haven&#8217;t found a downside yet, and it leaves open the option to expand.</p>
<p>Actually, expansion is something I&#8217;ve been thinking about a lot lately. And I&#8217;m finding it hard to see many good reasons for doing so &#8211; in the conventional sense, at least. The internet is allowing us to operate as loose confederations of solo operators, coming together and moving apart as the work demands. It&#8217;s a fun and flexible way to work. Why go through the hassle and extra cost of formally employing someone?</p>
<p>So yes, I do say &#8216;we&#8217;, more than I expected. But generally speaking, that &#8216;we&#8217; is a reference to my contacts list rather than myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

