<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John McGarvey - web copywriter &#187; Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/category/tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk</link>
	<description>Good web writing? Get to the point. Be clear. Have a conversation. Make people smile.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Once it&#8217;s online, it&#8217;s there for the taking</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/04/03/once-its-online-its-there-for-the-taking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/04/03/once-its-online-its-there-for-the-taking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=1462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An experience this week has reminded me of one of the internet&#8217;s truisms: once you&#8217;ve put something online, you can&#8217;t control how it gets used. Along with a few hundred other people, I went down to the BBC&#8217;s Broadcasting House last weekend to protest against the closure of BBC 6 Music. While I was there, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1486" title="Save BBC 6 Music" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/6music.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="224" align="right" />An experience this week has reminded me of one of the internet&#8217;s truisms: once you&#8217;ve put something online, you can&#8217;t control how it gets used.</p>
<p>Along with a few hundred other people, I went down to the BBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/keyfacts/stories/broadcasting_house.shtml" target="_blank">Broadcasting House</a> last weekend to protest against the closure of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/" target="_blank">BBC 6 Music</a>.</p>
<p>While I was there, I snapped a bunch of photos and put them up on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmcga/sets/72157623714570778/detail/" target="_blank">Flickr</a>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not great shots, but nonetheless the <a href="http://love6music.com/" target="_blank">Love 6 Music</a> website wanted to use them. Fair enough, I thought. After all, I support what they&#8217;re trying to achieve. Some of my pictures duly appeared on the site.</p>
<p>The next day The Guardian covered the protest &#8211; and included <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/gallery/2010/mar/29/bbc-6-music-protest?picture=360933291" target="_blank">some of my photos in a gallery</a>, all credited to <em>www.love6music.com</em>. It turns out the people behind the campaign had spoken to The Guardian and allowed them to use the pictures.</p>
<p>Now, initially I was taken aback by this. I felt I&#8217;d given permission for the photos to be used on a non-profit campaigning website, not on a commercial newspaper&#8217;s site.</p>
<p>However, once I thought it through, I realised I&#8217;d been pretty vague &#8211; I&#8217;d given permission in an <a href="http://twitter.com/johnmcg/status/11157481277" target="_blank">easily-misinterpreted tweet</a> which didn&#8217;t really explain under what circumstances I&#8217;d be unhappy with the photos being used:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Sure, be my guest [to use the photos]! They&#8217;re all Creative Commons  anyway.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I allow most of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmcga/" target="_blank">my photos on Flickr</a> to be used for non-commercial purposes under a system called <a href="http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>. However, I&#8217;ve never wanted commercial websites to use my pictures for free. It&#8217;s the same for my writing; if someone&#8217;s making money from my work in some way, I expect to get paid.</p>
<p>Anyway, in this case I decided to bend my principles a bit. It is pretty cool to have your pictures on a national newspaper&#8217;s website, and I care a lot about the survival of this particular radio station, so I emailed The Guardian and asked for a credit, which they duly added.</p>
<p>So, all&#8217;s well that ends well? Yes, in this case. But it goes to show just how hard it is to keep tabs on your digital content.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s words, pictures, video or sound &#8211; someone can always grab it and use it the way they want. And even though technically you keep the copyright and can forbid people from using it, in practice it&#8217;s hard to even find out it&#8217;s happened.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a pain where your professional work is concerned. But when it&#8217;s personal photos, musings or other stuff you absolutely have to keep control of, you&#8217;re better off not putting it online in the first place. That&#8217;s the only way to be 100% certain it&#8217;s not being used in ways that make you unhappy.</p>
<p>The specific lesson I learnt in this case is that when someone is nice enough to ask permission before taking your content, always make your answer specific. If you&#8217;re not happy for them to pass your stuff on for publication on other websites, tell them. Because if you don&#8217;t, you can&#8217;t really complain when your content starts popping up in unexpected places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/04/03/once-its-online-its-there-for-the-taking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to edit your own writing</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/20/how-to-edit-your-own-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/20/how-to-edit-your-own-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=1336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter whether you&#8217;re a professional web copywriter (like me) or a professional something-else (maybe that&#8217;s you), we all have to edit our own work from time-to-time. We do it when we read through an email before sending it, when we put the finishing touches to a new business proposal or when we dash off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1344" title="rubbers" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/rubbers.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="166" align="right" />No matter whether you&#8217;re a professional web copywriter (like me) or a professional something-else (maybe that&#8217;s you), we all have to edit our own work from time-to-time.</p>
<p>We do it when we read through an email before sending it, when we put the finishing touches to a new business proposal or when we dash off a press release. (You probably don&#8217;t do it when writing the weekly shopping list, but that&#8217;s ok.)</p>
<p><strong>Editing isn&#8217;t easy</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not easy to edit your own text. Because you wrote it, you&#8217;re less likely to spot mistakes. Trust me &#8211; I once wrote a blog post promoting an event which got a the date of the event totally wrong. I wrote &#8220;14 November&#8221; instead of &#8220;14 January&#8221;. And I didn&#8217;t realise until a reader pointed it out.</p>
<p>That happened because I was in a rush. I wanted to get the information out there as soon as possible. Want to avoid this sort of embarrassing mistake? I&#8217;ve put together a few tips for you:</p>
<p><span id="more-1336"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Find peace and quiet. </strong>I can write in a busy café just fine. I  often find listening to music helps me get words onto the page. Yet when  it comes to editing, only silence will do. Get to a quiet place. It really helps.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Give yourself some time. </strong>If you bowl straight in to edit a  piece the moment you finish writing it, you&#8217;re asking for trouble.  You&#8217;re likely to read what you think you wrote rather than what&#8217;s  actually on the page. If you have the luxury, give it a day or two. Even  an hour will help.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Use a checklist. </strong>If I&#8217;m editing a batch of articles, I put together a list of things to check in each one. This helps me focus on the things that matter and forces me to  approach the edits in a structured way. My checklists tend to concentrate on what the client needs rather than things I&#8217;d look for anyway. For instance, I might include making sure I&#8217;ve kept inside a strict word count and only used US English.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Do it (at least) twice. </strong>One check is never enough to catch everything. I read through my pieces twice &#8211; first to check everything makes sense, I haven&#8217;t used extra words and the tone is right, and then to actually proofread, check for bad grammar, spelling and so on.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Read it out loud. </strong>Yes, you&#8217;ll look silly. And yes, it really does work. This forces you to articulate every syllable of your writing. You&#8217;ll pick up on missing words straight away and be able to immediately tell whether the piece flows. Best to find an empty room though, lest your colleagues think you&#8217;ve finally lost it.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Print it out. </strong>It&#8217;s harder to edit stuff on screen. I&#8217;m not sure exactly why &#8211; I think it&#8217;s something to do with looking at a backlit display &#8211; but printing work out makes it easier to find mistakes. I print what I&#8217;ve written (double-sided, at the lowest quality), use a red pen to make changes, then input them into my computer. It can help to learn some <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=4&amp;ved=0CBQQFjAD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pit-magnus.com%2Fpitmagnus%2Fbooks%2Fpr_marks.pdf&amp;ei=lVR0S9qOJ5H60wS52JiqCQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNH41HGovWy2ve3G3FM3SHd5XqF3cQ&amp;sig2=ZTi4VntiyxGXeJy4ZVUlQQ" target="_blank">proofreading symbols</a> (PDF link).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Know your weaknesses. </strong>We all have our own writing weaknesses. For some unknown reason, my fingers automatically type &#8220;customer&#8221; whenever I write a word starting &#8220;cus&#8230;&#8221;. Tune in to the kind of mistakes you make and you&#8217;ll be more likely to spot them.</li>
</ul>
<p>To sum up: if you want to do a really professional editing job, find a quiet place, then start talking to yourself while ticking items off a checklist and printing out reams of paper. Ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/20/how-to-edit-your-own-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The six perils of writing in public</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/16/the-six-perils-of-writing-in-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/16/the-six-perils-of-writing-in-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have spotted from my previous posts that I like to work out and about. Cafes, pubs, bars &#8230; they&#8217;re all fair game for me and my little laptop. I enjoy working on the move, but this very modern way of getting stuff done isn&#8217;t without its pitfalls. Here are six situations to watch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/coffee-machine.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1307" title="Could you write with the noise of a coffee machine?" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/coffee-machine.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="166" /></a>You might have spotted from my previous posts that I like to work out and about. Cafes, pubs, bars &#8230; they&#8217;re all fair game for me and my <a href="/2010/02/14/writers-review-toshiba-nb200-netbook" target="_self">little laptop</a>.</p>
<p>I enjoy working on the move, but this very modern way of getting stuff done isn&#8217;t without its pitfalls.</p>
<p>Here are six situations to watch out for when it&#8217;s just you and your laptop:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The lunchtime rush.</strong> At 10.30am, the cafe you&#8217;re in is nice and quiet. But at 11.30, something happens. The door doesn&#8217;t stop opening. People pile in, ordering take out or grabbing the last spare chairs. Nursing a small coffee while the world passes through, you feel conspicuous and in the way. Especially when some noisy office workers elbow their way to the table next to yours. Productive? You might as well give up now.</li>
<li><strong>The noisy children. </strong>These normally appear mid to late afternoon, though you can encounter babies and toddlers at any time of day. I&#8217;m undecided which is worse: the hyperactive ones who run about and push bits of furniture around, or the well-behaved, over-inquisitive ones who sit near you with their mum or dad and just won&#8217;t stop asking questions. Often about what the strange man with the computer is doing.</li>
<li><strong>The power crisis.</strong> Less than one cup of coffee into a stop at a café and my old laptop was gasping for juice. I constantly had my eye on the location of power sockets in the room, ready to shift tables when a prime spot became free. No matter what precautions I took, the machine would inevitably die during a highly productive spell. And have you ever had that awkward conversation when a member of café staff spots your unofficial power hook-up?</li>
<li><strong>The ergonomic nightmare. </strong>Starbucks chairs weren&#8217;t designed with the prevention of carpal tunnel syndrome in mind. In fact, they were probably designed to be uncomfortable to sit in for long periods, thus encouraging a fast customer turnover. (Ok, so maybe that&#8217;s just me being particularly cynical. But pay attention to what your body&#8217;s telling you. Wrists aching? Back sore? Time to find a proper desk.)</li>
<li><strong>The beer-on-tap temptation.</strong> One of my favourite spots to work is a bar/cafe just round the corner from my flat. The thing is, they have beer on tap. <a href="http://www.budweiserbudvar.co.uk/product_budvardark.php" target="_blank">Good beer</a>. A pint is ever-so-appealing, especially if I&#8217;m struggling with a tricky bit of work. I can usually resist the temptation, or postpone it by promising myself a glass when the job&#8217;s done, but every now and then (usually on a Friday afternoon) the pull is too strong.</li>
<li><strong>The toilet dilemma. </strong>Some cafés make you feel bad if you&#8217;re not constantly sipping while you work. With that much fluid intake, the inevitable tends to happen sooner rather than later. And that can lead to a difficult choice: do you pack everything up to guard against theft (in which case you might as well move venues), or trust the slightly shifty bloke on the next table to watch the laptop and papers you&#8217;ve spread out?</li>
</ol>
<p>What obstacles have you faced when working out and about? Leave a comment and let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/02/16/the-six-perils-of-writing-in-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writers: make sure your work files are safe</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/19/writers-make-sure-your-work-files-are-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/19/writers-make-sure-your-work-files-are-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have read about how I broke my netbook the other week. The computer&#8217;s hard drive &#8211; contanining important work I&#8217;ve done for clients &#8211; could have been destroyed when it hit the ground, and the incident has rammed home the importance of keeping safe backups of my work. Thankfully, I&#8217;m already pretty clued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1173" title="Dropbox screenshot" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dropbox_ready2.jpg" alt="Dropbox screenshot" width="495" height="220" /></p>
<p>You might have read about how I <a href="/2010/01/09/economic-losses-caused-by-snow-140-so-far/">broke my netbook</a> the other week. The computer&#8217;s hard drive &#8211; contanining important work I&#8217;ve done for clients &#8211; could have been destroyed when it hit the ground, and the incident has rammed home the importance of keeping safe backups of my work.</p>
<p>Thankfully, I&#8217;m already pretty clued up. A few months back I started using <a href="http://www.dropbox.com" target="_blank">Dropbox</a>, an online backup and file sharing tool. It does three important jobs for me, and I wouldn&#8217;t be without it now:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>It keeps my files safe. </strong>Dropbox creates a special folder on my computer. Anything I save there gets backed up across the internet to a secure server. It means that if my laptop is stolen or broken, or files get deleted, I can hop online and get them back.</li>
<li><strong>It synchronises files across my computers. </strong>Dropbox keeps files up-to-date on both my computers. If I edit a file on my main PC, it gets copied across to my netbook the next time I turn it on. I&#8217;m never without the latest version of my work.</li>
<li><strong>It lets me share files with other people.</strong> It&#8217;s easy to set up shared folders with Dropbox, so lots of people can access them. I occasionally use this feature to get work to clients, but I can see it could be really useful for working together on projects.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s not the end of this handy service. It has a web interface, so I can log in and grab my files from any internet-connected computer. There&#8217;s even an <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/iphoneapp" target="_blank">iPhone app</a>.</p>
<p>It does version control, so I can roll back to an older version of a file if I make some horrendous mistake. And &#8211; I&#8217;m aware making a statement like this is asking for trouble &#8211; it&#8217;s never crashed on me. Not once.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have a safety net to protect your important files, <a href="http://www.dropbox.com" target="_blank">go and get Dropbox</a>. Now. It&#8217;s free for up to 2GB of storage, and a piddling $9.99 a month for up to 50GB. I can&#8217;t think of many services I&#8217;d recommend more wholeheartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/19/writers-make-sure-your-work-files-are-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download my plain English copywriting contract</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/11/download-my-plain-english-copywriting-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/11/download-my-plain-english-copywriting-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I started out, I didn&#8217;t have any kind of copywriting contract for my clients to sign. But after a few months of relying on informal, emailed proposals, I felt I needed something more official. Yes, contracts are boring, dull, tedious and generally unenjoyable. But they are important. They explain exactly what each party in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1153" title="Signing on the line" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/contract_ready.jpg" alt="Signing on the line" width="230" height="185" />When I started out, I didn&#8217;t have any kind of copywriting contract for my clients to sign. But after a few months of relying on informal, emailed proposals, I felt I needed something more official.</p>
<p>Yes, contracts are boring, dull, tedious and generally unenjoyable. But they are important.</p>
<p>They explain exactly what each party in a  business relationship should expect &#8211; and what they have to do. They can also be invaluable if things ever go wrong, because it&#8217;s  harder to argue with something if it&#8217;s written down in black and white.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s my copywriting contract for free</strong><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Most contracts I&#8217;ve encountered are written using lots of legalese and can be very confusing. I wanted mine to use plain language, so anyone could understand it. To get going, I needed some inspiration, so I hunted  around and found <a href="http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/">Andy Clarke</a>&#8216;s  excellent <a href="http://24ways.org/2008/contract-killer" target="_blank">killer  contract</a>.</p>
<p>This seemed like a great starting point, so I grabbed it and made some pretty substantial changes. Andy offered his contract up to anyone who wanted to use it, and in the same spririt, I&#8217;m doing that too. So download my copywriting contract now. It&#8217;s available in several file formats:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/copywriting_agreement.doc" target="_blank">Copwriting contract in Word format</a></li>
<li><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/copywriting_agreement.pdf" target="_blank">Copywriting contract in PDF format</a></li>
<li><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/copywriting_agreement.odt" target="_blank">Copywriting contract in Open Office format</a></li>
</ul>
<p>I received a lot of really helpful feedback while working on this. So thanks to <a href="http://www.marketingdonut.co.uk" target="_blank">Simon Wicks</a>, Matt Telfer, <a href="http://www.badlanguage.net" target="_blank">Matthew Stibbe</a>, <a href="http://jimanning.com/" target="_blank">Jim Anning</a> and <a href="http://blog.msgrocock.org.uk/" target="_blank">Martin Grocock</a>.</p>
<p><strong>What you need to know about my copywriting agreement</strong></p>
<p>Feel free to download my copywriting agreement and use it however you like. All I ask is that if you republish it, you mention me and link back here.</p>
<p>You can change it any way you want. At the very least, you&#8217;ll need to replace the bits in square brackets with your own details and decide how you want to handle cancellations.</p>
<p>Oh &#8211; and this is important: <strong>I&#8217;m not a legal professional, so get your legal eagles to examine it properly if you decide to use it.</strong></p>
<p><strong>More information about my copywriting agreement</strong></p>
<p>I tailored this contract to address the following problems in particular, because they&#8217;re things I&#8217;ve been concerned about when working with clients:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Scope creep. </strong>I usually work to a fixed price on projects and try to be flexible.  Clients seem to prefer this &#8211; but I&#8217;ve been worried they&#8217;ll see my flexibility as an  invitation to change the brief midway through a project, creating lots of extra work for me.</li>
<li><strong>Tardy payment. </strong>So far, I&#8217;ve been pretty lucky &#8211; most clients are super-speedy payers. But with no  agreed payment schedule beyond the 30 days stated on my invoice,  I&#8217;ve not been particularly well covered if I do hit problems.</li>
<li><strong>Deadline drift. </strong>It&#8217;s a real pain when you turn a job round fast only for the client take forever to decide on revisions. It makes scheduling jobs trickier &#8211; and it takes longer to get back  up to speed if I&#8217;ve not worked on a project for a while.</li>
</ul>
<p>These may or may not be things that concern you &#8211; and so you might want  to add or remove bits from the contract before you use it.</p>
<p><strong>Bad clients are still bad clients</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think even the best contract in the world can ever substitute for treating your clients properly, communicating with them effectively and doing each job to the best of your ability. And it would be a bit naïve to think a contract can protect you entirely from bad clients.</p>
<p>But what it can do is make your business relationships more official, provide a clear document to refer to in the event of any sort of disagreement &#8211; and give you a bit leverage if things go wrong. If you use mine, please, let me know how you get on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2010/01/11/download-my-plain-english-copywriting-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rage Against The (X Factor) Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/12/20/rage-against-the-x-factor-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/12/20/rage-against-the-x-factor-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you&#8217;ll have seen if you&#8217;ve been near a TV, radio, Twitter or Facebook, sweary activist rock group Rage Against The Machine have pipped the X Factor&#8217;s Joe McElderry to this year&#8217;s Christmas number one. Like many people, I&#8217;m pretty pleased about this. And I&#8217;m also a bit suprised, because had you asked me a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you&#8217;ll have seen if you&#8217;ve been near a TV, radio, Twitter or Facebook, sweary activist rock group <a href="http://www.ratm.com/" target="_blank">Rage Against The Machine</a> have pipped the X Factor&#8217;s <a href="http://xfactor.itv.com/2009/finalists/detail/fnl_80018.htm" target="_blank">Joe McElderry</a> to this year&#8217;s Christmas number one.</p>
<p>Like many people, I&#8217;m pretty pleased about this. And I&#8217;m also a bit suprised, because had you asked me a week ago, I&#8217;d have said the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2228594104" target="_blank">Facebook campaign</a> to get the song to the top of the charts had about as much chance of success as the <a href="http://www.omrlp.com/" target="_blank">Monster Raving Loonies</a> have of winning the next general election.</p>
<p>Why the scepticism? Well, joining a group on Facebook only takes a couple of seconds but it&#8217;s getting people to do more that has always seemed like the tricky bit. There are thousands of well-meaning Facebook groups and online petitions that have plenty of supporters but achieved nothing else of note.</p>
<p>So why did this campaign succeed &#8211; and make such a big impact &#8211; where others have failed?</p>
<ul>
<li>It tapped into something people feel strongly about: frustration at the X Factor&#8217;s dominance of the Christmas number one slot.</li>
<li>It went huge on Facebook and Twitter. The sheer amount of support indicated that maybe it could actually happen.</li>
<li>Mainstream media picked it up in a big way. That lent credibility to the grass roots campaign and fostered a real belief it could work.</li>
<li>It wasn&#8217;t asking for a huge commitment. Sure, downloading the track cost a few pence, but it was easy and cheap to make a difference.</li>
</ul>
<p>I think a lot of it came down to credibility. It wasn&#8217;t until Thursday, when Rage performed live on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0070htg" target="_blank">5 Live&#8217;s breakfast show</a> (swear words and all), that I seriously thought there was a possibility we&#8217;d see them at number one. And it was only at that point that I was willing to purchase the single myself.<span id="more-1003"></span></p>
<p>Call it jumping on the bandwagon or wanting to back a winner. Whatever, I bet lots of other people were in the same situation &#8211; they&#8217;d heard of the campaign much earlier, but were only convinced to support it once coverage reached a certainly level. It was getting to that tipping point that ensured the success.</p>
<p>Like it or not, there are parallels between promoting a cause you believe in and marketing a product. So if you&#8217;re trying to do either one of those things, here&#8217;s what you can learn from the success of RATM:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Pick your proposition carefully.</strong> Maybe it was more luck than judgement, but the &#8220;I won&#8217;t do what you tell me&#8221; philosophy of RATM&#8217;s music made them the ideal band to pitch against the sanitised gloss of the X Factor winner. Even if both are on the same record label.</li>
<li><strong>Choose a simple call to action. </strong>The RATM campaign would have had zero chance of success if people hadn&#8217;t been able to buy online, and the track wasn&#8217;t so cheap. So make sure it&#8217;s easy for people to do the thing you&#8217;re asking them to do.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t neglect traditional media. </strong>Yes, this campaign started on Facebook and lots of people (like me) first heard about it through Twitter. But getting on the radio, on telly and in the papers gives you a credibility that Facebook can&#8217;t match. Not yet, anyway.</li>
<li><strong>Be honest. </strong>Misleading methods aren&#8217;t going to cut it online, where there are thousands of people just waiting to check up on you<strong>. </strong>If you don&#8217;t really believe in the cause you&#8217;re promoting (or the product you&#8217;re selling), don&#8217;t expect anyone else to either.</li>
</ul>
<p>Oh &#8211; and congratulations to Rage Against The Machine. Let&#8217;s hope they make good on their <a href="http://www.ratm.com/" target="_blank">promise of a free celebratory gig</a>. Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/12/20/rage-against-the-x-factor-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to be a better writer</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/11/15/how-to-be-a-better-writer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/11/15/how-to-be-a-better-writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this idea that the quality of an ebook can be judged by the hyperbole used to market it. The more excessively shouty and lurid the sales blurb, the less valuable the advice itself is likely to be. You&#8217;ve probably seen the worst offenders. Over-excitable, garish web pages employ capital letters, bright colours and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this idea that the quality of an ebook can be judged by the hyperbole used to market it. The more excessively shouty and lurid the sales blurb, the less valuable the advice itself is likely to be.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably seen the worst offenders. Over-excitable, garish web pages employ capital letters, bright colours and phrases like &#8220;THE BOOK THE PROFESSIONALS DON&#8217;T WANT YOU TO HAVE!!!!!!&#8221;  Making unfeasible promises about unimaginable wealth, they only say one thing to me: run away.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve seen a few of these it&#8217;s easy to tar every ebook with the same brush. Easy, yes. Unfair? Definitely.</p>
<p><strong>One ebook worth reading</strong></p>
<p>I say this because over at <a href="http://www.badlanguage.net" target="_blank">Bad Language</a>, old pal Matthew Stibbe has released a <a href="http://www.badlanguage.net/ebook" target="_blank">comprehensive ebook</a> to help make you a better business writer.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no guarantee of lifelong wealth and a conspicuous lack of garish promotional graphics on Matthew&#8217;s site, yet this excellent guide offers some of the best business writing advice I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>Grounded firmly in the real world, the book is packed with practical information to help you write better. It explains how the principles of good journalism are just as important to business writing. It&#8217;s all about telling an interesting story and geting under the skin of your audience.</p>
<p>Structured as a 30-day course, (but almost as useful read as and when you get the chance), Matthew&#8217;s book is free, well-written, and useful regardless of whether you write a bit, write a lot, or just work with writers.</p>
<p>Rather than listen to me bang on about it here, <a href="http://www.badlanguage.net/ebook" target="_blank">just go and take a look</a>.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">I have this idea that the quality of an ebook can be judged by the hyperbole</p>
<p>used to market it. The more excessively shouty and lurid the sales blurb,</p>
<p>the less valuable the advice itself is likely to be.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve probably seen the worst offenders. Over-excitable, garish web pages</p>
<p>employ capital letters, bright colours and phrases like &#8220;THE BOOK THE</p>
<p>PROFESSIONALS DON&#8217;T WANT YOU TO HAVE!!!!!!&#8221;  Making unfeasible promises</p>
<p>about unimaginable wealth, they only say one thing to me: run away.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve seen a few of these it&#8217;s easy to tar every ebook with the same</p>
<p>brush. Easy, yes. Unfair? Definitely.</p>
<p>I say this because over at Bad Language, old pal Matthew Stibbe has released</p>
<p>a comprehensive ebook to help make you a better business writer.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no guarantee of lifelong wealth and a conspicuous lack of garish</p>
<p>promotional graphics on Matthew&#8217;s site, yet this excellent guide offers some</p>
<p>of the best business writing advice I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>Grounded firmly in the real world, the book is packed with practical</p>
<p>information to help you write better. It explains how you can apply the</p>
<p>principles of good journalism to business writing so you tell an interesting</p>
<p>story that really gets under the skin of your audience.</p>
<p>Structured as a 30-day course, (but almost as useful read as and when you</p>
<p>get the chance), Matthew&#8217;s book is free, well-written, and useful regardless</p>
<p>of whether you write a bit, write a lot, or just work with writers.</p>
<p>Rather than bang on about it here, I urge you to take a look.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/11/15/how-to-be-a-better-writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does usability actually mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/02/28/what-does-usability-actually-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/02/28/what-does-usability-actually-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking about website usability lately, and this recent blog post over on Signal vs Noise really struck a chord with me. It&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve seen the idea of usability expressed so succinctly: &#8220;It’s about putting yourself in the other person’s shoes. It’s about looking into the future, foreseeing any potential obstacles, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I&#8217;ve been thinking about website usability lately, and this <a title="Fit to be used?" href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/1594-fit-to-be-used" target="_blank">recent blog post</a> over on <a title="Signal vs Noise" href="http://blogcabin.37signals.com/svn/" target="_blank">Signal vs Noise</a> really struck a chord with me. It&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve seen the idea of usability expressed so succinctly:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: left;"><p><em>&#8220;It’s about putting yourself in the other person’s shoes. It’s about looking into the future, foreseeing any potential obstacles, and removing them. And that’s a great way to get people on your side.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">I think when you get down to it, if you&#8217;re building a new website, application or physical product, those are the important things. Whatever you&#8217;re creating, it needs to be simple to use. Like my <a title="iPhone" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a>, it should just work.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">That applies to copywriting too, of course. It&#8217;s why you should should always consider every sentence &#8211; every word, in fact &#8211; really carefully. First of all, is it necessary at all? Second, assuming it is, have you expressed whatever you&#8217;re trying to express clearly and succinctly as possible?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">While I&#8217;m on the subject, I think <a title="New features" href="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2009/02/26/IfYourUsersCantFindTheFeatureItMightAsWellNotExist.aspx" target="_blank">Dare Obsanjo makes a good point</a> about introducing new features to your product, service of website:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: left;"><p><em>&#8220;If a user can&#8217;t find the feature, it might as well not exist&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">I agree completely. You can cram your website full of information. You can make your product full of cutting edge features. But if poor usability means people can&#8217;t find that information or use those features, then really &#8230; what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2009/02/28/what-does-usability-actually-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six reasons you should be using Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/12/23/six-reasons-you-should-be-using-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/12/23/six-reasons-you-should-be-using-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started using Twitter a few months ago. If you haven&#8217;t encountered it yet, it&#8217;s a kind of micro-blogging tool which lets you post updates about what you&#8217;re doing. Each update takes a similar form to Facebook&#8216;s &#8220;John is&#8230;&#8221; function, and you&#8217;re limited to 160 characters, so it&#8217;s a bit like sending a text message. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> a few months ago. If you haven&#8217;t encountered it yet, it&#8217;s a kind of micro-blogging tool which lets you post updates about what you&#8217;re doing. Each update takes a similar form to <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>&#8216;s &#8220;John is&#8230;&#8221; function, and you&#8217;re limited to 160 characters, so it&#8217;s a bit like sending a text message.</p>
<p>You can see my latest update in the right column of this blog, or see my stream of tweets (that&#8217;s what the little updates are called) over on my <a title="John McGarvey on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/johnmcg" target="_blank">Twitter homepage</a>. Once you&#8217;re a member, you can follow other Twitter members. When you follow someone, all their tweets appear in your Twitter stream.</p>
<p>Frankly, it&#8217;s not immediately obvious what Twitter is for. As a copywriter, I joined without a good idea of why I was joining it or what I&#8217;d use it for. I mainly just wanted to work out what the hell it was all about: it&#8217;s not the easiest of things to get your head around, and the best way to work it out is to try it.</p>
<p>But since I started using it, it&#8217;s become clear there&#8217;s a lot more to Twitter than meets the eye. It&#8217;s not just a way to let your mates know you&#8217;re just back from the shops or down the pub. It&#8217;s a seriously useful tool that can help you in all kinds of ways.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d definitely recommend you get over to <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> and sign up for an account now. But if you need some persuading, here are six things I&#8217;ve found it useful for:</p>
<p><strong>Finding useful contacts. </strong>It can be a networking tool, basically. Whether you&#8217;re a web copywriter, like me, or in a completely different line of work, you can make some great connections on Twitter. One of the best ways is to take a look at the people you follow, and see who they follow. If anyone looks interesting, follow them too. Because most tweets are public, it&#8217;s fine to follow whoever you like.</p>
<p><strong>Keeping in touch with your mates. </strong>I&#8217;ve all but given up on Facebook. I never entirely got the hang of it, and these days I find if I log in I just get overwhelmed with information. The most interesting bit is following friends&#8217; status updates. And Twitter lets me do that, without all the other spurious stuff that&#8217;s part of Facebook. Of course, you&#8217;ll need to persuade your mates to join too. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Getting answers fast. </strong>If you have enough followers, Twitter becomes a bit like <a title="Any question answered" href="http://www.issuebits.com/" target="_blank">one of those services</a> where you can text any question and receive an almost instant response. For instance, before a recent trip to Berlin, I <a title="What to do in Berlin" href="https://twitter.com/johnmcg/status/1048947879" target="_blank">tweeted asking for recommendations</a>. Within a few minutes, I&#8217;d discovered that one of my followers had edited a guidebook of the city. Result! <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Connecting with celebrities. </strong>When I discovered national institution <a title="Stephen Fry on Twitter" href="https://twitter.com/stephenfry" target="_blank">Stephen Fry</a> was on Twitter, I thought it was absolutely fantastic. Because it&#8217;s so obviously him tweeting, you get a direct connection to someone you only usually see on TV. Not sure how he deals with the massive number of direct messages he must get though. Apparently <a title="Brtiney on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/britneyspears" target="_blank">Britney&#8217;s on Twitter too</a>, though it looks like a rather sanitised, PR-driven effort rather than Britney tapping away at a keyboard for herself. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Keeping up with the news. </strong>I&#8217;m not going to claim that Twitter is a useful tool for in-depth journalism and analysis of current affairs. But it&#8217;s great for getting eyewitness snapshots of events as they unfold. For example, there was an explosion on Slough Trading Estate the other week. I used to work there, so was interested in what was going on. Local news sites weren&#8217;t reporting anything, but by searching Twitter I found <a title="Slough explosion" href="http://twitter.com/hellojp/status/1032015276" target="_blank">someone who was there as it happened</a>. And just yesterday, one guy <a title="Plane crash tweet" href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/21/eyewitness-news-indeed/" target="_blank">tweeted from a plane crash</a>. Yes, really. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Venting your frustrations.</strong> I&#8217;m not sure how much my followers appreciate it, but I&#8217;ve vented at the terrible train service offered by <a title="First Great Western" href="http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk" target="_self">First Great Western</a> <a title="FGW tweet" href="http://twitter.com/johnmcg/status/1065409459" target="_blank">more</a> <a title="FGW tweet" href="http://twitter.com/johnmcg/status/1047544139" target="_blank">than</a> <a title="FGW tweet" href="http://twitter.com/johnmcg/status/982576292" target="_blank">once</a>. With <a title="Twitterific" href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific" target="_blank">Twitterific</a> on my iPhone I can tweet from anywhere, and it makes me feel a little less helpless when I find myself awaiting a delayed train yet again. Try it sometime. It really does make you feel better.</p>
<p>There are plenty of other ways to use Twitter, and plenty of other reasons to use it. So if you haven&#8217;t given it a go yet, <a title="Twitter sign up" href="https://twitter.com/signup" target="_blank">hop on over and sign up</a>. You can tweet directly from the website, or use one of the many <a title="Twitter clients" href="http://twitter.com/downloads" target="_blank">web-based and mobile phone clients</a> to make it easier.</p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t mind the occasional train-related rant, do <a title="John McGarvey on Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com/johnmcg" target="_blank">add me once you&#8217;ve signed up</a>. I&#8217;ll be sure to return the favour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/12/23/six-reasons-you-should-be-using-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vauxhall Vectra usability study</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/05/27/the-vauxhall-vectra-usability-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/05/27/the-vauxhall-vectra-usability-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/05/27/the-vauxhall-vectra-usability-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I moved house this weekend and hired a car; a tank-like Vauxhall Vectra. Actually, despite having the appearance of a lumbering behemoth, it wasn&#8217;t that bad being behind the wheel. Bizarrely enough though, the car&#8217;s indicators got me thinking about how important it can be to conform to people&#8217;s expectations. Conventions abound in virtually every [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right;" src="http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/vectra.jpg" alt="Vauxhall Vectra" align="right" />I moved house this weekend and hired a car; a tank-like Vauxhall Vectra. Actually, despite having the appearance of a lumbering behemoth, it wasn&#8217;t that bad being behind the wheel.</p>
<p>Bizarrely enough though, the car&#8217;s indicators got me thinking about how important it can be to conform to people&#8217;s expectations.</p>
<p>Conventions abound in virtually every product we use. They make things easy-to-operate and easy-to-understand.</p>
<p>Imagine if every kettle worked in a different way, or if some door handles were postioned on the &#8216;wrong&#8217; side of the door. Making a coffee would be a nightmare. And each time you opened a door would be a gamble; it might hardly move, or it might fly open and send you crashing through it.</p>
<p>As any web designer worth their salt will tell you, conventions work online too. Following them is a good way to make your website easier to use. Just ask <a title="The need for web design standards" href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040913.html" target="_blank">Jakob Nielsen</a>.</p>
<p>Put menus where people expect to find them, make the normal things happen when people click links and using your site will be a less-frustrating, altogether more pleasant experience.</p>
<p><strong>Challenging conventions</strong></p>
<p>Every now and then, a company tries to challenge a tried-and-trusted convention. Just occasionally, they&#8217;ll do so successfully; think of the iPod&#8217;s <a title="Apple iPod click wheel" href="http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/ipod4.htm" target="_blank">click wheel</a>. Why use &#8216;up&#8217; and &#8216;down&#8217; buttons to navigate through lists when you can do the same thing faster (and more accurately) with a touch sensitive wheel?</p>
<p>But most of the time, these convention challenges fall flat. The Vectra&#8217;s indicators are a fine example &#8211; because they work in a different way to virtually every car I&#8217;ve ever driven. To turn them on, you push the indicator stalk one way. To turn the indicators off, you push the stalk the same way again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that, like most other cars, you can also stop the turn signal by pushing the stalk the other way. But often it doesn&#8217;t work well; you simply end up signalling to turn the other way, and then get all confused.</p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;ve never driven another car like it, and I do apologise to anyone who had to share the Hanger Lane gyratory with me yesterday afternoon. I was trying to go right. Not right-left-right as you might&#8217;ve been led to believe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that, given time, you get used to this new way of doing things. But why bother when the old way works just as well?</p>
<p>Because this was a hire car, I was stuck with it for the weekend. However, if it had been a website with a dodgy navigation, I&#8217;d have been right out of there.</p>
<p><strong>Clear benefits</strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong: I don&#8217;t think challenging convention is always a bad thing. If nobody ever did it, all our vacuum cleaners would still have bags and the world wide web probably wouldn&#8217;t even exist.</p>
<p>However, if you do decide to do things differently on your website, remember that you&#8217;re asking a lot from your visitors. You&#8217;re asking them to learn a whole new behaviour, just for you. Essentially, you&#8217;re forcing them to do something different to what comes naturally.</p>
<p>For it to work, there has to be a definite benefit for them. It has to be easier, or faster, or better for some other reason. If it isn&#8217;t, don&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>So be careful when you go against convention &#8211; or even when you bend it a little. Your great new idea might end up driving visitors away. If you&#8217;re running an online business, that could be costly.</p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;"><em>Image © GM Corp</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcgarvey.co.uk/2008/05/27/the-vauxhall-vectra-usability-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
